
Dan Levy asked a question a lot of people have been circling for months. On September 24, 2026, the Schitt’s Creek co-creator posted an Instagram Reel as a lifelong glasses wearer who could not see the point of hiding cameras in frames.
“Why do we need to hide cameras in glasses again? What is the purpose of this particular trend of technology?” he said. He added that he could not think of a time he wished his glasses had secret cameras, then offered a cave-explorer exception before landing on the line that spread: other than “some perverts from my high school who would probably want to take some camera glasses into the girls’ change room,” he could not think of a single reason.
Hours later he clarified that he knows there are legitimate exceptions, including people who need the technology, and that he was speaking generally. The products, he noted, are not marketed as life-saving medical devices.
The timing was sharp. Meta had just unveiled camera-free Ray-Ban Meta Audio glasses at its Connect conference on September 23.

source: Wikimedia Commons / Patrick.suechan, WikiPortraits (CC licensed)
Levy has worn glasses since childhood and later launched his own line, DL Eyewear. That background gives the comment weight. He is not a distant critic of gadgets. He is someone who lives in frames and still does not buy the idea that a camera belongs inside them by default.
The larger debate is not about whether anyone should ever record. It is about whether recording should be nearly invisible. Meta Ray-Ban glasses look like ordinary sunglasses. A small LED is meant to signal when the camera is on. Reporting across 2025 and 2026 showed that the light is easy to miss in daylight and that some users covered or removed it. Meta later pushed software updates that disable the camera if the indicator is physically tampered with or destroyed, and said it had already shut cameras off on thousands of devices.
Media coverage and users began calling the camera models “pervert glasses” after videos surfaced of people filming strangers, often women, during pickup attempts and pranks, then posting the clips. Venues in London and elsewhere told customers to turn the cameras off. Privacy researchers argued that consent becomes harder when the camera sits on a face instead of in a raised phone.
Meta has said the glasses were designed with privacy in mind and that the recording light is a core safeguard. The company also released the audio-only Ray-Ban Meta Audio model, which keeps calls, music, and Meta AI but drops photo and video capture. Those glasses start at $349 and are slimmer because they do not house cameras.
That product exists alongside newer camera models that still ship with 12-megapixel cameras and higher-resolution video. Sales of AI glasses have been strong. EssilorLuxottica, Meta’s partner, reported millions of pairs sold in 2025. The market is expanding, which is exactly why Levy’s question travels.
Watch Meta discuss the audio-only glasses and related privacy questions here: Zuckerberg shows Meta's audio-only glasses

source: Ray-Ban official product CDN
The useful part of Levy’s rant is not the high-school joke. It is the design question underneath it. If the camera is so valuable, why must it be hidden? If the point is hands-free capture for travel, parenting, or accessibility, why does the form factor still look like ordinary eyewear that no one thinks to question?
Those are fair questions for anyone who wears glasses, and for anyone who would rather not guess whether the person across the table is recording.
What do you think cameras in glasses are actually for? Drop your take in the comments, tap like if this one landed, and subscribe so you do not miss the next cultural flashpoint.
You can write and read similar articles at the Cizeex app.
#DanLevy #SmartGlasses #MetaRayBan #PrivacyTech #WearableCameras
USA Today reporting on Levy’s September 24, 2026 Instagram Reel and follow-up comment; Meta Connect 2026 announcements for Ray-Ban Meta Audio and Gen 3 camera models; Meta statements on LED tampering updates; contemporaneous coverage from The Verge, BBC, CNN, Los Angeles Times, and Wired on smart-glasses privacy, venue policies, and public backlash.
Join Cizeex free to react, comment, and catch new stories first, or get the Cizeex app.
Join Cizeex free